<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Best of the Web?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.flow14.com/blog/best-of-the-web/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.flow14.com/blog/best-of-the-web/</link>
	<description>reflections on design, creativity, web development and more!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 18:29:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kyle</title>
		<link>http://www.flow14.com/blog/best-of-the-web/comment-page-1/#comment-28560</link>
		<dc:creator>Kyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 02:52:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.flow14.com/?p=398#comment-28560</guid>
		<description>Tim - when I wrote this, I actually struggled with the idea of Step being a design magazine judging websites on the basis of pure design vs what I&#039;ve think they&#039;ve done &#8212; rewarding sites on the basis style with (seemingly) little thought given to the substance. I can understand and even appreciate the difference, but for those who don&#039;t, this is perpetuating the problem.

&quot;Skip Intro&quot; buttons and welcome pages warnings about screen resolution and browser warnings were played 6 years ago.

I actually have the same type of beef with &quot;best of print&quot; issues that include an overabundance of one-off posters for indy bands. I love the pieces and I&#039;m happy for the designers, but I think they&#039;re ultimately art projects that don&#039;t necessarily solve real-world design problems. Design for design&#039;s sake, if you will.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tim &#8211; when I wrote this, I actually struggled with the idea of Step being a design magazine judging websites on the basis of pure design vs what I&#8217;ve think they&#8217;ve done &#8212; rewarding sites on the basis style with (seemingly) little thought given to the substance. I can understand and even appreciate the difference, but for those who don&#8217;t, this is perpetuating the problem.</p>
<p>&#8220;Skip Intro&#8221; buttons and welcome pages warnings about screen resolution and browser warnings were played 6 years ago.</p>
<p>I actually have the same type of beef with &#8220;best of print&#8221; issues that include an overabundance of one-off posters for indy bands. I love the pieces and I&#8217;m happy for the designers, but I think they&#8217;re ultimately art projects that don&#8217;t necessarily solve real-world design problems. Design for design&#8217;s sake, if you will.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://www.flow14.com/blog/best-of-the-web/comment-page-1/#comment-28557</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 18:51:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.flow14.com/?p=398#comment-28557</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s a graphic design magazine, so they&#039;re judging on appropriate criteria. While the sites you named may have beautiful functionality, they aren&#039;t terribly attractive.

That being said, I agree that the design community needs to drop the love affair with Flash for Flash&#039;s sake. It was a crutch in the early days of the web, and isn&#039;t necessary for a lot of these sites.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a graphic design magazine, so they&#8217;re judging on appropriate criteria. While the sites you named may have beautiful functionality, they aren&#8217;t terribly attractive.</p>
<p>That being said, I agree that the design community needs to drop the love affair with Flash for Flash&#8217;s sake. It was a crutch in the early days of the web, and isn&#8217;t necessary for a lot of these sites.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
